Sociological Analysis of the Presidential Election of 2012

Sociological Analysis of the Presidential resource of 2012 from a Structural Functionalist Perspective and a Conflict Perspective. As the presidential choice draws closer, we could vividly view our society from loving conflict and structural expirealist views. The democratic wait on helps us to ask why do we accept and emb expedite democracy, how does it influence our favorable patterns and plays and how does democracy re eithery work for the perceptual constancy of our society.In this essay, I give analyze the presidential election of 2012 using sociological perspective with emphasis on manifest and potential functions, secernate, race and gender conflicts. It is a cognise fact that democracy and demography ar like Siamese twins that substructurenot be separated. These demographics include gender, race, age, disability, wealth, employment status, and locations. Politicians relieve oneself used, and shut away using, these elements to realize which group is the best to appease. On gender tax return, the two prominent semipolitical parties, Democratic and the Republi sack up Parties, know that feminines votingrs pull in up 52% of the US electorate (Bloomberg News).These women scarper to pick out for either political c eacher that caters to their needs. Also, race is part of political consideration. The Afri john-Americans, Asian-Americans, the Hispanics and purity ar different choose blocs which the politicians must(prenominal) butterfly. According to the online Hispanic News, the recent dismissal of field Census data confirms that 50 million Latinos ar part of the American electorate. Not only the Hispanics be increase in population, the African American grew by 1. 6% in 2010 while the Asian-American are recently declared, by CNN, as the hurrying growing minority in the US. other demographic to be considered is age. Steven Thomma and William Douglas of McClatchy Newspaper said, Statistics convey that older white and rise up-to-do choosers are more than reliable electorates than the young voters they persist to vote republican Party. The interrogatory now is how tout ensemble these fit into our sociological perspective. I will start by miening at the manifest function of our democracy. In truth, democracy has helped to stabilize and withal create unity among citizens. It has become a recognized and accepted process which everyone take care forward to periodically.It is intended to involve all qualified adults in picking their abutting leaders. The sense is that once everyone is involved, then the legal age will be pleased with the government. However, as a good deal as there has been reliable governance through democracy, there wipe out also been some unintended consequences too. These consequences can be seen by examining the latent function of our democracy. Today, one can hardly larn TV or listen to the tuner without seeing or hearing the break dance that exists in the political s ystem of our country.Citizens have been secernd into two or more groups based on their party affiliations. The divide is so obvious that parties are not willing to com plight-emitting diodege on any issue. The result is a stagnant government, and no reasonable policies have been passed into law. It is hard to know if this fraction is recognized but we sure as shooting know that it is unintended. Aside from stability and devotion which democracy brought into our society, we have seen inequality that generates conflicts. These conflicts can be seen in class, race and gender.On Class, jibe to Real Cleat Politics, the Pew look Center found in 2008 that 6 out of ten Americans say that the republican Party favors the rich. Real arrive at Politics went further to state how the Republican policies give tax break to the rich and the Democrats want tax breaks for the middle class and the poor. This situation has created a permanent big gap between the rich and the poor. Another confl ict is race it is not move that the political parties are try to woo the social group with the highest population.The Democrats are trying to lure the Hispanic with immigration see the light while the Republicans are trying to change integrity their White base with a promise of deportation of illegal immigrants. Both sides are aggressively marketing their ideas to each race for votes. According to US Catholics News, these problems have led to family division, causing a heavy doorbell on children and families of Hispanic community. The Hispanics are not the only group worthless from this political division, The African- American, the Asian-American, the Indian-Americans and all other minorities are all struggling to fit into the kind structure.For all of these, one can comfortably see both the minorities and the bulk voting along their party line. The minority ethnic groups tend to vote for Democrats while the majority ethnic group votes Republican. Another well observed soc ial conflict can be seen in gender. The gender issue has brought out many social issues. From cleaning ladys health, contraceptives and abortion, parenthood and womanhood, the list goes on and women are taking their stands on issues that rival them. The women are the largest electorate in US.LA Progress, an online News Journal, after series of research, simply concludes that Women will patch up 2012 Presidential Election. For this reason, politicians are climax up with policies that will benefit women. However, not all these policies are favorable to all women. For example, the pro-life advocates want abortion abolished, the pro-choice advocates wants abortion to be part of interference healthcare programs. The debate has generated so much heat that some abortion clinics were burned d take in and some abortion doctors were murdered.With all these issues in mind, pro-choice women in general vote for Democrats while pro-life women mostly vote for Republicans. Men have been the a gitators for gun rights. Policies are fashioned to give them freedom to own guns without any restrictions these policies have led to the availability of street guns. The lovers of guns mostly vote republican while the pro-gun control group mostly votes for republicans. It is important to mention here that National Rifle Association, the best known tree trunk that represents gun rights advocates, has both male and female members.Above all, this election is very unique because from the look of things, the minorities especially the Hispanic and women are change magnitude in population and they will teach the election outcome. The Hispanic and women mostly vote for Democrats while Asian-American, the fastest growing minority, mostly votes for Republicans because of their conservative values. In all, the political embellish is definitely shifting from what it used to be. We will all see the political party it favors in November. References Bloomberg News